|
Jiro
Aug 11, 2009 17:14:24 GMT -5
Post by Sykee on Aug 11, 2009 17:14:24 GMT -5
Oh my god you guys are so baaad XD Unfortunately-for my character- if Jiro puts Sayomi in a position that she can't resist, attack back or get away. By realistic standards then well...sucks for Sayo huh? This is GANTZ after all. I can't get attached to a character, she may end up dying like..epic fast ;;;
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 11, 2009 17:19:15 GMT -5
Post by Haloninjaman808 on Aug 11, 2009 17:19:15 GMT -5
dun dun duhhhh!
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 11, 2009 17:51:17 GMT -5
Post by DawgX on Aug 11, 2009 17:51:17 GMT -5
Well looks like Sayo is gunna get raped huh?
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 11, 2009 18:57:26 GMT -5
Post by Sykee on Aug 11, 2009 18:57:26 GMT -5
Pfff, I'm a realistic player, but that doesn't mean I'm bad. B3 Sayomi is a tough cookie. The odds are on either side right now. B) But she's also not stupid. Mowahahaha.
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 11, 2009 19:22:56 GMT -5
Post by Oka Ace on Aug 11, 2009 19:22:56 GMT -5
I can't believe we've already resorted to rape in the roleplay.
*laughs, puts hand on forehead and shakes it*
But hey it happened really fast in the manga too didn't it? First mission even. It's just that last mission we didn't have agirl.
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 11, 2009 19:37:08 GMT -5
Post by (Jin) Somnus. on Aug 11, 2009 19:37:08 GMT -5
I can't believe we've already resorted to rape in the roleplay. *laughs, puts hand on forehead and shakes it* But hey it happened really fast in the manga too didn't it? First mission even. It's just that last mission we didn't have agirl. Kato interrupted the Yakuza, nearly killing him via choking. And the biker guy tried to, but he got zapped up.
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 11, 2009 21:09:36 GMT -5
Post by Haloninjaman808 on Aug 11, 2009 21:09:36 GMT -5
actually not even first mission, but the 2nd chapter. When it came out for the second week there was rape!
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 12, 2009 1:48:56 GMT -5
Post by (Jin) Somnus. on Aug 12, 2009 1:48:56 GMT -5
Interrupted attempt. Almost rape.
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 12, 2009 1:52:19 GMT -5
Post by Haloninjaman808 on Aug 12, 2009 1:52:19 GMT -5
i have different standards, the minute the person is forced against a wall with no clothes, tis rape.
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 12, 2009 3:02:25 GMT -5
Post by Sykee on Aug 12, 2009 3:02:25 GMT -5
i have different standards, the minute the person is forced against a wall with no clothes, tis rape. Technically its called assault. Rape is when someone is sexually assaulted..as in sex but forced. ;;
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 12, 2009 3:05:52 GMT -5
Post by Haloninjaman808 on Aug 12, 2009 3:05:52 GMT -5
like i say i have different standards dammit...
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 12, 2009 3:13:53 GMT -5
Post by (Jin) Somnus. on Aug 12, 2009 3:13:53 GMT -5
Raaaaape. Rape.
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 12, 2009 3:54:11 GMT -5
Post by Sykee on Aug 12, 2009 3:54:11 GMT -5
like i say i have different standards dammit... Okay let me put it this way. What say you push a girl against a wall to kiss her, and her dress falls off leaving her nakkie? Then she cries rape and you get 15 years in prison. How are your standards then? If she had just accepted it as assault..well only about 2 years at most. ouo
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 12, 2009 4:04:08 GMT -5
Post by Haloninjaman808 on Aug 12, 2009 4:04:08 GMT -5
oh well, i am half awake right now so your complicated sentences hurt...
lets just leave it at that rape and assault are bad...
|
|
|
Jiro
Aug 12, 2009 4:05:37 GMT -5
Post by Fay on Aug 12, 2009 4:05:37 GMT -5
lol. The definition of rape isn't really based off of anyone's standards. In other words there is a clear cut definition for it. It clearly wasn't rape......yet. No matter which way you swing it, it isn't rape. Attempted rape, but not rape. I prefer to go by the definitions of the English language. It's a simple fact. If you have different standards then that means depending on the situation, in your opinion, someone who forces another against a wall naked, should get charged with rape. But that doesn't make it actually rape. I mean, what's the point of having a universal language if people aren't even going to apply the definitions properly? All you're doing is taking a concept and giving it to a word. Thus making the word have meaning. It doesn't mean you have to agree with the law regarding said concept, but the concept still exists. Edit: Damn, I was late.
|
|